bound putrescine, a distinctive player under salt stress in the natrophilic sugar beet in contrast to glycophyte tobacco

Authors

r hajiboland

abstract

the influence of salinity on the different polyamine fractions (free, conjugated, and bound) was compared in a natrophilic halophyte (beta vulgaris l. cv. ic) and a salt sensitive glycophyte (nicotiana rustica l. cv. basmas). low-level salinity (25 mm nacl) and high salinity (150 and 50 mm nacl for sugar beet and tobacco, respectively) were supplied in hydroponics. under low salinity shoot dry weight increased in sugar beet, but decreased in tobacco. under high salinity growth reduction in sugar beet and tobacco were similar. however, sugar beet accumulated higher na and cl in roots and shoots than tobacco. low salinity caused an increase (22%) in the rate of net co2 assimilation in sugar beet. this parameter was depressed in both species under high salinity. sugar beet had constitutively higher free spermine levels in roots and shoots than tobacco. spermidine levels were constitutively higher in shoots of sugar beet and in roots of tobacco. under salt stress tobacco plants tended to increase free polyamine levels. the most important salt–induced rise in polyamine titer, however, was found in roots and shoots of sugar beet. in sugar beet roots the bound putrescine fraction increased 9.3-fold under growth- stimulating salt supply (25mm) and 20-fold under salt stress (150 mm). in tobacco roots this fraction only increased 2.3 and 3.8-fold under mild (25 mm) and high salt stress (50 mm), respectively. our results provide support to the view that bound putrescine contributes to the protection against salt stress in the natrophilic sugar beet.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Bound Putrescine, a Distinctive Player under Salt Stress in the Natrophilic Sugar Beet in Contrast to Glycophyte Tobacco

The influence of salinity on the different polyamine fractions (free, conjugated, and bound) was compared in a natrophilic halophyte (Beta vulgaris L. cv. IC) and a salt sensitive glycophyte (Nicotiana rustica L. cv. Basmas). Low-level salinity (25 mM NaCl) and high salinity (150 and 50 mM NaCl for sugar beet and tobacco, respectively) were supplied in hydroponics. Under low salinity shoot dry ...

full text

from linguistics to literature: a linguistic approach to the study of linguistic deviations in the turkish divan of shahriar

chapter i provides an overview of structural linguistics and touches upon the saussurean dichotomies with the final goal of exploring their relevance to the stylistic studies of literature. to provide evidence for the singificance of the study, chapter ii deals with the controversial issue of linguistics and literature, and presents opposing views which, at the same time, have been central to t...

15 صفحه اول

the effect of sugar beet seed advancement on response to salt stress in vitro conditions

sensivity of seed germination stage to saline soil is the main obstacle to proper field establishment of sugar beet crop. in previous studies different tissues of sugar beet showed high tolerance to salt stress by of increasing sodium chloride levels in in vitro condition. an experiment was by to study the response of sugar beet zygotic embryos to salt stress in in vitro conditions. sterile per...

full text

path analysis under normal and salt stress conditions in sugar beet germplasm

understanding the relationship between root yield and other traits in sugar beet may be a crucial step towards successful breeding of this important crop. path analysis provides a useful method in analyzing the genetic and phenotypic coefficients of correlations. this method is able to effectively unveil direct and indirect effects among traits of interest. in this research, root yield, yield c...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later


Journal title:
journal of sciences, islamic republic of iran

Publisher: university of tehran

ISSN 1016-1104

volume 23

issue 2 2012

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023